|
||||||
|
||||||
|
China - country reference file, extracted
from Trade Unions of the World,
6th edition (January 2005) Political and Economic Background Under Mao, China pursued a series of initiatives including the "Great Leap Forward" of the late 1950s and the "Cultural Revolution" of the mid-1960s which provided the context for wholesale political purges allied with the implementation of fundamentalist communist economic policies that brought widespread famine and destitution. These campaigns alternated with periods when more pragmatic policies were followed. In the final years before Mao's death in 1976 a power struggle set in between radicals, who became known as the "gang of four", and moderates including Deng Xiaoping (purged during the Cultural Revolution and again in 1976 as a "capitalist roader"). By the beginning of the 1980s Deng had established control, denounced the excesses of the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution and set China on a course which emphasized the progressive loosening of centralized command economy policies while retaining the tight grip on power of the CPC. During the 1980s the commune system was ended, free markets for farm products were developed, and state businesses began to pay orthodox taxes instead of transferring their entire profits to the government. Central product allocation was reduced and (within limits) private businesses permitted. Certain coastal regions (the Special Export Zones - SEZs) were allowed economic autonomy and to develop cautious trading rela-tions with neighbouring capitalist states. Finally, trade in privately-owned land was legalized. An important development during this period was the creation of a labour market to replace administrative allocation of labour. Labour contracts similar to those found in capitalist countries were introduced. It also became easier to terminate the employment of workers. During the 1990s, in the wake of the collapse of
communist regimes in most of the rest of the world and the crushing of
the democracy movement in Tiananmen Square in June 1989, the CPC retained
power through a continuation and development of this broad policy, first
under Deng and then his successor Jiang Zemin. The process of reforming
state enterprises and encouraging the private sector intensified over
the decade. By 2002, the number of SOEs had fallen to 159,000,
down from twice that number in the mid 1990s While the economic reforms
have been highly successful in stimulating growth, the privatization policy
has created tension because of rising unemployment and accusations of
favouritism and corruption in privatization. It has had serious implications
for the system of social welfare, which was enterprise-based. The policy
of winding up inefficient enterprises has been moderated by the impact
on employment and social stability, and the central government is also
unable to ensure uniform implementation of its policies in all areas of
the country. While precise division between public and private
is impossible because of the diversity of forms of ownership in China,
about two thirds of China's GDP is generated in the non-state sector.
While per capita incomes are still low, output has quadrupled in the past
two decades and the size of China's population is such that total GDP
is now second only to that of the USA. Annual growth in GDP peaked at
14.2% in 1992, and is now around 8% (2002 estimate). Trade Unionism Following the establishment in 1927 of KMT rule under Chiang Kai-shek in Shanghai, however, many trade unionists were executed, and thenceforth the unions were restricted, with national and general federa-tions prohibited, and government-sponsored "yellow" unions installed. The Red Army under Mao Zedong, which took power in 1949, was peasant-based, but in 1948 the Com-munist Party (CPC) organized the ACFTU which functioned for 18 years as sole trade union centre. The ACFTU held its first congress since 1957. Until 1966 it and its associated unions were active at workplace level, principally in the areas of education, labour safety, welfare and propaganda. In 1966, however, Mao launched the Cultural Revolution to eliminate those accused of "bourgeois tendencies". Trade unions were replaced by workplace revolutionary committees and the ACFTU was itself dissolved in Dec. 1966. Trade unions were denounced as counter-revolutionary in purpose and methods. Following the death of Mao in 1976, however, the "gang of four" radicals were arrested and many of the policies adopted in the late 1960s reversed. In Oct. 1978, the ACFTU and its newspaper, The Workers' Daily (Gongren Ribao), which had been suppressed in 1966, resumed publication in the same month. In a statement to the congress, ACFTU chairman Ni Zhifu recalled that: "In December 1966 the office building (of the ACFTU) was occupied by force and The Workers' Daily was closed and sealed, at the personal instigation of Jiang Qing (Mao's widow and one of the gang of four). Many trade unions at the provincial, municipal and autonomous regional levels, as well as basic-level trade unions, were battered and crushed. Their office buildings were occupied by force, properties divided and files lost". The first union to resume its activities, after 12 years' suspension, was the All-China Federation of Railway Work-ers' Unions, which began its national congress at the end of Oct. 1978. China has not ratified ILO Convention No.87 (Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organize, 1948). It resumed participation in the work of the ILO in 1983, and the ACFTU says that "since 1983, the Chinese trade unions have actively urged the Chinese government and departments concerned to draw up plans for ratification and application of international labour conventions". In recent years, trade unionism in China has been regulated by the Trade Union Law. It was passed by the National People's Congress in 1992 and extensively revised in 2001. The Law contains a number of internal tensions. On the one hand, it gives official trade unions wide-ranging powers and responsibilities, and ensures that they are adequately resourced. On the other hand the Law ensures that trade unions are subordinate to the Communist Party, and attentuates their capacity to advocate for employees by requiring them to 'mobilize employees to complete production duties and working duties with great efforts (Article 7). . Unions operating under the Law are thus torn between representing employees and implementing Party-State policy, which seeks to maintain labour discipline. One source of these tensions is that for much of the period under Communist rule, Chinese trade unions operated almost entirely in state-owned and collective enterprises. These enterprise were 'mini welfare states', which provided benefits that in a developed country would be delivered through the social security system. A major role of the unions in these enterprises was to influence the distribution of these benefits. They tended not to adopt an oppositional or countervailing role to the employer, as the employer was the state, of whom workers were supposed to be the masters. The Law still reflects this legacy. However, now that China's private sector is increasingly important, and the public sector is operating on more of a private sector model, the legacy of earlier style of unionism inhibits the evolution of the law towards a system suited to a market economy. As the Party-State opposes the development of an independent activist union movement, the tensions within the Law are likely to remain. It is well known that China does not comply with ILO Convention No.87 (Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organize, 1948), nor Convention No.98 (Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining). It has not ratified those Conventions. This is because, although the Trade Union Law creates a right to form trade unions (Article 3), and to provides a significant degree of union security (see, e.g. Articles 3, 11, 17,18, 50-55), it does not enable independent unions to be formed. The 2001 revisions confirm that all unions must be subordinate to the All China Federation of Trade Unions (ACFTU)( Article 2) according to the principle of democratic centralism. This means that 'trade union organizations at a lower level shall be under the leadership of trade unions organizations at a higher level'. A further problem with these provisions is that they do not explicitly prevent senior managers being union members, or even from holding executive positions in unions. Thus, especially in state-owned enterprises, many directors have held union office. Some unions thus simply legitimate management plans. One attempt to limit the conflict of interest here is the new Article 9, although this stops short of banning management participation in unions outright. The 2001 Law makes new provision for collective bargaining, although the legal framework as set out in the Law, as well as in the 1994 Labour Law, is incomplete. Neither the Trade Union Law, nor the Labour Law, deals extensively with unfair labour practices or other aspects of the collective bargaining process, although an employer cannot refuse to negotiate without a 'tenable reason' (Article 53). A new Collective Contract Law has been mooted and is urgently needed. Despite the absence of a comprehensive collective bargaining framework, collective agreements are being concluded in increasing numbers of workplaces. By the end of 2001, some 270,000 collective contracts had been concluded. However, it is unclear if many of these involve genuine bargaining. A further shortcoming in relation to collective bargaining is that there is no clear right to strike in China. Nevertheless, strikes are not expressly prohibited. Recent years have seen large numbers of worker protests in China. These are usually associated with claims for arrears rather than for improvements in working conditions. The ACFTU does not usually organise these strikes, Indeed, it often attempts to prevent them (see further below). This is because, while unions have a role in representing workers where a work stoppage occurs (Article 27), they are also required to 'assist the enterprise to resume production and working order as soon as possible.' The Trade Union Law contains many provisions requiring unions to safeguard workers rights to 'democratic management' (e.g. Articles 5, 6, 19, 23, 35-38). This concept has been implemented in the public sector in a relatively straightforward way through workers' congresses (which are similar in some ways to European Work Councils). The Law says that the trade union committee of an enterprise is the "working body" of the "workers' congress", tasked with the implementation of its decisions. According to the ACFTU, the workers' congress system has been set up in almost all state-owned enterprises in large and medium-sized cities. The events of 1989 had the effect of extending the role of the workers' congresses, but the trend of economic reform has been to emphasize the right of managers to make decisions and overcome obstacles to radical restructuring. In many enterprises the workers' congress is effectively moribund. How democratic management is to be realised in the private sector is not entirely clear, although unions have a right to be consulted on significant issues of operation and management, including the design of new facilities and processes and in the implementation of safety systems. One area where trade unions potentially have clout is in the enforcement of labour standards. Notoriously, very many Chinese firms breach the Labour Law and the 2002 Law on Work Safety, especially those which are smaller and/or located in the private sector. Both the Trade Union Law and the Work Safety Law give extensive powers to unions to ensure that standards are met (Trade Union Law Articles 21-26, Labour Safety Law Article 52). These provisions typically give unions the power to complain of a violation, and require the employer to investigate the compliant and make amends if a violation has occurred, If an employer refuses to do so, the union can refer the matter to local authorities. Unions have legal capacity and can sue in their own right. It remains to be seen to what extent unions will exercise these powers. A puzzling feature of the Labour Law (articles 80 and 81) is that unions have an ambiguous role in the mediation and arbitration of labour disputes. Thus, dispute resolution within the enterprises consists of a tri-partite committee with employer and employee representatives and a trade union chair but where the dispute is taken beyond the enterprise, the labour dispute arbitration committee (LDAC) is constituted by employer representatives, the trade union and a chair from the local labour bureau. Thus, it is unclear whether a trade union is an employee representative or an impartial mediator. By the end of 2001, China had, according to the People's Daily, established some 3,192 LDACs. The Law provides unions with funding through a levy on employers amounting to 2% of the total wage bill. Moreover, the wages of full-time trade union committees members must be paid by the enterprise. Other committee members are entitled to three paid working days per month of union leave. It would seem, however, that many firms do not comply with this requirement. Trade Union Centre The ACFTU is governed by a its National Congress, which convenes every five years. Between meetings of the Congress, the ACFTU is managed by an Executive Committee, composed of 267 members. The Executive Committee in turn elects the members of the Presidium, which exercises decision making power when the Executive Committee is not in session. The routine work of the ACFT is handled by its Secretariat. There are 31 trade union federations for the provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities. In parallel are 10 national industrial unions. The ACFTU is organized on the Soviet model on the principle of democratic centralism, i.e. that lower level bodies must be guided by higher levels (see now Article 9 Trade Union Law). The ACFTU was affected by the reform movement of the late 1980s that culminated in the crushing of the occupation of Tiananmen Square in June 1989. In 1988 Zhu Hou Ze was appointed as ACFTU 1st secretary. Zhu had been dismissed as head of the party propaganda department in Feb. 1987 because he was associated with the policies of the then party leader Hu Yaobang, who had failed to stop student demonstrations. As ACFTU 1st secretary Zhu probably encouraged moves to invigorate workers' congresses and to make unions more responsive to the welfare concerns of workers. He also appears not to have prevented members from participating in the reform and democracy movements of 1989. In December of that year he was replaced by Yu Hon-Gen, former president of the National Coal Corporation. The 1992 Trade Union Law confirmed the ACFTU's role as the sole national organization of trade unions and defined the role of the unions as an instrument of official policy. This role was re-emphasized in the ACFTU's revised constitution of 1993. ACFTU chairman Wang Zhaoguo is a member of the CPC Politburo and there is a close mesh between union and party at all levels. The 14th (five-yearly) National Congress of the ACFTU was held in September 2003. . At that meeting a new ACFTU Charter was promulgated. The new Charter maintains the democratic centralist structure of the ACFTU. The Charter imposes obligations on ACFTU member unions that are not always consistent with representing the interests of employees. In private firms, for example, unions are to, 'construct consultation systems, implement democratic participation, represent workers' political rights and material interests, protect the national and social interest, respect the lawful rights and interests of investors and work together [with them] develop the enterprise (art 29). Further important developments at the Congress included strong reaffirmation of the Chinese Communist Party's leading role, the adoption of the 'Three Represents' ideology of former CCP Chairman Jiang Zemin, developing further strategies to form trade unions in private firms, promoting the direct election of local ACFTU union chairpersons, and extending membership to migrant rural workers (who are likely to suffer the most severe labour abuses). The ACFTU has also shown awareness of the problems of social dislocation caused by economic reforms, unemployment, widespread non-payment of benefits and dissatisfaction as privatization is seen to make well-connected individuals wealthy at the expense of those who had built up the enterprises through their labour. The ACFTU is emphasizing its role in assisting workers to find new jobs, in providing re-training and organizing consumer cooperatives, and in organizing social benefits. The ACFTU has a consultative role in drafting and revising laws, at national and local level, affecting labour and social welfare. Where industrial action occurs in China, it tends to consist of essentially individualistic acts by isolated dissidents have not represented a challenge to the existing trade union structure. However, the restructuring of the economy has led to the development of wider forms of industrial unrest, focused on living standards and working conditions, rather than broader political aspirations. Traditionally, workers have depended on the enterprise for a wide range of benefits, such as health care and housing. As many SOEs are effectively bankrupt, there are many cases of workers going unpaid for extended periods, laid-off workers not getting subsistence allowances, and pensioners not receiving their pensions. Enterprises have reportedly covered losses by diverting money from pension funds and embezzlement by senior managers is said to be not uncommon. While the enterprise-based system has broken down, an adequate state back-up system has not yet been constructed in its place. The Public Security Bureau reported 60,000 large demonstrations across the country in 1999, and was expecting this figure to rise to 100,000 in 2000. Laid-off workers, and workers owed back pay, have in many places laid virtual siege to government offices or blocked roads and railroads until dispersed by the police. The approach adopted in dealing with such unrest has varied by locality. In some instances, the authorities have sought to find solutions to grievances; in others, demonstrations have been broken up by riot police or the army and leaders detained. There are reports that some activists have been subjected to administrative detention merely for taking up causes before labour disputes and arbitration committees. According to the ICFTU: "in some large plants, work committees, comprising officials from local ACFTU branches, the local labour bureau authorities and the Public Security Bureau (PSB), have been set up to monitor and pre-empt worker action. Many medium and large enterprises have detention facilities and security officials can detain and sentence protesting workers to three years in a labour camp". In general branch unions have avoided giving support to any form of militancy such as work stoppages or go-slows and normally work to prevent such actions developing. However, according to the China Labour Bulletin, at "local plant level branch chairpersons are being laid off along with other workers, and more often than not it is the local party secretary who takes up the vacant union position". The history of past purges of union officials who fell out of step with official policy is a deterrent to local unions adopting positions unacceptable to higher bodies. The official unions have been seeking to define a role that is in alignment with official policy while also helping to mitigate the impact of restructuring. The unions have opened more than 2,000 employment agencies and set up more than 6,000 vocational training organizations where 2.2 m. workers have been re-trained. They also have set up service businesses and market places and run a "warmth" programme to assist needy families. The unions are involved in efforts to reform the social security, employment, housing and medical insurance systems. The ACFTU participates in the Workers Group of the
ILO and in a various UN fora. However, it is not a member of the ICFTU,
the major international union federation. The ICFTU's present policy towards
the ACFTU was adopted in November 2002. It states that 'the ICFTU, noting
that the ACFTU is not an independent trade union organisation and, therefore,
cannot be regarded as an authentic voice of Chinese workers, reaffirms
its request to all affiliates and Global Union Federations having contacts
with the Chinese authorities, including the ACFTU, to engage in critical
dialogue. Some ICFTU members refuse to maintain contact with the ACFTU.
Other trade union centres On June 2, 1989, the ACFTU called for the crushing of the independent unions. On June 4 troops put down demonstrations in Tiananmen Square. However the first secretary and vice-president of the ACFTU, Zhu Hou Ze, was regarded as having favoured the reform movement and this led to his dismissal in Dec. 1989; he was replaced by Yu Hon-Gen, former president of the National Coal Corporation. The leader of the Beijing Federation, Gou Hai Feng, expressed similar views and was arrested in August, charged with having set fire to a bus. On June 14, the Public Security Bureau declared WAFs illegal. A number of their members were posted on wanted lists and some are believed to have been sentenced to death. On June 16 delegates to the UN Special Session on Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities heard of 13 workers executed for 'counter-revolutionary crimes' and 67 arrested for their involvement in WAFs. Around the time of the first anniversary of the Tiananmen Square events the authorities released several hundred prison-ers incarcerated since June 1989. It was thought however that none of the WAF leaders was among them and also that the official position that only 45 of these were still held might be an underestimate. In 1999 the ICFTU reported that many activists involved with the WAFs were still in prison, psychiatric hospitals run by the Public Security Bureau, or forced labour camps. Others involved with the movement had been deported. In 1992 an underground Free Labour Union of China was formed but its leaders were quickly arrested and imprisoned for "organizing and leading a counter-revolutionary group". They became known as the "Beijing 16". Since that time there have been recurrent efforts by individuals or small groups of dissidents to organize unions, or circulate petitions calling for free unions. Those involved have generally been imprisoned on criminal charges or subjected to "re-education through labour", a form of administrative detention which dispenses with the need for a trial. The treatment of those subjected to "re-education through labour" is said to be commonly worse than in the criminal justice system, with torture used. |
||||||
|